<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									Pepitde modification name is not the same/good one. - Proline Studio				            </title>
            <link>https://www.profiproteomics.fr/forum/general-studio/pepitde-modification-name-is-not-the-same-good-one/</link>
            <description>Forum dedicated to Proline Software</description>
            <language>fr-FR</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 22:58:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>Pepitde modification name is not the same/good one.</title>
                        <link>https://www.profiproteomics.fr/forum/general-studio/pepitde-modification-name-is-not-the-same-good-one/#post-256</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[For exemple, if you&#039;ve added a new modification in Mascot with same composition/mass than an other one (to group modifications for instance):

Mascot Modification: Propionyl on S / T  with...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For exemple, if you've added a new modification in Mascot with same composition/mass than an other one (to group modifications for instance):</p>
<ul>
<li>Mascot Modification: Propionyl on S / T  with different 'group'.</li>
<li>Add Modification: Propionyl_ST on S / T in same group.</li>
</ul>
<p>In Proline, after importing and running some process on a dataset corresponding to a Mascot search (B.dat) using Propionyl_ST, the modification associated with a peptide is "Propionyl (S1)" and not "Propionyl_ST (S1)"</p>
<p>--- </p>
<p>Here is the explanation why this occurs. This problem is not fixed yet.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>When you import a file <em>A.dat</em> with  Propionyl (S) and Propionyl (T) as variable PTMs and peptides with one of this modification, Proline</p>
<ul>
<li>creates a PTM object “Propionyl (S)” (idem for (T) ...)</li>
<li>creates a peptide with a link to that PTM and with a “readable_PTM” property = “Propionyl (S1)”</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p>When you import your new file <em>B.dat</em>, with  Propionyl_ST (ST) as variable PTM, and peptides with this modification : </p>
<ul>
<li>before creating the PTM objects, Proline will verify that these PTMs do not already exist in your project. In this case,  Propionyl_ST in <em>B.dat</em> is the same PTM as  Propionyl in <em>A.dat</em> (same delta mass, same composition H(4) C(3)). <br />So there is no new PTM created.</li>
<li>during the import, the “readable_ptm” of the peptide is created from information read in the <em>B.dat</em> file. The readable_ptm = “Propionyl_ST (S1)” in the dataset from <em>B.dat</em>. So you don’t see that the PTM associated to this peptides is “Propionyl (S)” and not “Propionyl_ST (S)”. This is not a problem, PTMs are identical  !</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p>Now, when you create a new dataset from the dataset <em>“B.dat”</em>, by merging it or using it for a quantitation.  The peptide’s “readable_ptm” property in this new dataset is created from the PTMs associated to the peptide. Here, it will use "Propionyl (S)" so the “readable_ptm” property of the peptide will be “Propionyl (S1)”.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.profiproteomics.fr/forum/general-studio/">Proline Studio</category>                        <dc:creator>Véronique Dupierris</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.profiproteomics.fr/forum/general-studio/pepitde-modification-name-is-not-the-same-good-one/#post-256</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		